Sutherland Law in 10-million-dollar commercial case

Macdonald appeared in three cases this week

Sutherland Law in 10-million-dollar commercial case
Law firms appearing for the week ending June 30, 2022

Sutherland Law partner Rob Moubarak represented the defendants Royal Stone Interlocking Concrete Ltd. and several others in a $10 million case, Snook v Royal Stone Interlocking Concrete Ltd. et al. The plaintiff M. Snook is represented by Matthew Valitutti.

Kevin Lawrence Macdonald appeared in three cases this week.

Kevin Macdonald represented respondent M. Ber and several others in Middleton v Direct Broadcast Satellite Communications Corp. et al and JDM Group Ltd. et al v Direct Broadcast Satellite Communications Corp. et al, and Direct Broadcast Satellite Communications Corp. et al v JDM Group Ltd. et al.

Bennett Jones LLP appeared in two cases this week.

Joseph Blinick, partner, represented applicant Field Trip Health Ltd. in Field Trip Health Ltd. Blinick has a general litigation practice focused on corporate commercial disputes, securities litigation, class actions, and bankruptcy and insolvency matters.

Jason Berall, associate, represented applicant MacBryce Holdings Inc. and several others in Macbryce Holdings Inc. et al v The Magnes Group Inc. et al. Berall’s litigation practice is focused on corporate and commercial disputes, securities litigation, bankruptcy and insolvency, and class actions.

Goodmans LLP appeared in two cases this week.

Alan Mark, partner, represented defendants N. Walker and several others in Stronach v Stronach et al. Mark’s diversified practice specializes in corporate/commercial litigation, class actions and electricity law and regulation.

Melanie Ouanounou, partner, represented defendant N. Walker in a separate Stronach v Stronach et al case. Ouanounou commercial and class action defence litigation practices encompass a wide variety of business disputes with a focus on securities litigation, contract disputes, product liability and plans of arrangement.

Lax O'Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb LLP appeared in two cases this week.

Matthew Gottleib represented plaintiff S. Stronach in Stronach v Stronach et al. Gottlieb’s practice includes corporate and commercial disputes, insolvency and restructuring mandates, and other business litigation

Shaun Laubman represented respondent The Magnes Group Inc. and several others in Macbryce Holdings Inc. et al v The Magnes Group Inc. et al. Laubman’s practice focuses on corporate-commercial disputes, with particular expertise in shareholder, securities and franchise disputes

McCague Borlack LLP appeared in two cases this week.

Stephen Barbier, partner, represented applicant D. Middleton in Middleton v Direct Broadcast Satellite Communications Corp. et al and applicant JDM Group Ltd. in JDM Group Ltd. et al v Direct Broadcast Satellite Communications Corp. et al. Barbier has a broad civil litigation practice with extensive experience in breach of trust claims, commercial disputes, construction liens, First Nations consultation rights in land development, insurance coverage, product liability, professional liability and subrogation.

Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP appeared in two cases this week.

Christopher Naudie, partner, represented plaintiff Tridelta Investment Counsel Inc. in Tridelta Investment Counsel Inc. et al v GTA Mixed-Use Developments GP Inc. et al. Naudie practises corporate and commercial litigation, with a strong focus on corporate litigation, class action defence and cross-border litigation.

Craig Lockwood, partner, represented defendant A. Ossip, in his capacity as trustee of the 445327 Trust in Stronach v Stronach et al. Lockwood extensive experience in class proceedings, product liability matters, securities regulation, commercial banking litigation and pension litigation.

Teplitsky, Colson LLP appeared in two cases this week.

Stephen Brunswick, partner, represented respondent C. Bock in Canadian Equipment Finance and Leasing Inc. v The Hypoint Company Limited et al. Brunswick’s practice in litigation and dispute resolution include commercial, real estate, matrimonial, employment, estate and professional negligence.

Jonathan Kulathungam, partner, represented applicant Tung Kee Investment Canada Ltd. in Tung Kee Investment Canada Ltd. v 2394049 Ontario Inc. et al. Kulathungam’s broad and diverse litigation practice including partnership and shareholder disputes, construction litigation, land development litigation, commercial leasing, professional negligence claims, employment litigation, and general breach of contract claims.

 

Recent articles & video

Last few days to nominate in the Top 25 Most Influential Lawyers

Why this documentarian profiled elder rights advocate Melissa Miller in Hot Docs film Stolen Time

Saskatchewan government boosts practical learning at University of Saskatchewan College of Law

BC Supreme Court clarifies the scope of solicitor-client privilege in estate administration

Federal Courts invite public feedback on the conduct of a global review of its rules

BC proposes legislative changes to support First Nations land ownership

Most Read Articles

National Bank cannot fulfill Greek bank’s credit guarantee due to fraud exception: SCC

Canada facing pervasive ransomware, broader cyber-criminal landscape and threat from AI: lawyer

Ontario Court of Appeal rules against real estate developer for breach of a joint venture agreement

Canadian Lawyer partners with legal associations to survey legal graduates